Jurisprudence and Law
Jaza Valadbeygi; Vali Rostami; Manouchehr Tavassoli Naeini
Abstract
Given the effective role of cyberspace and the use of new electronic achievements in today’s life and facilitating the provision of government services and optimization of public resources, e-government services in the form of freedom of information can lead to democracy and institutionalization ...
Read More
Given the effective role of cyberspace and the use of new electronic achievements in today’s life and facilitating the provision of government services and optimization of public resources, e-government services in the form of freedom of information can lead to democracy and institutionalization of democratic mechanisms. It can also provide the needs of the people, leading to the freedom of information in the context of e-government. It can also lead to the growth and development of society as well as the participation of citizens in the decision-making process and the protection of citizens’ rights and freedoms, as well as to the institutionalization of democratic mechanisms. On the other hand, it can have challenges such as conflict with the principle of privacy. There is a conflict with the principle of human and national security and a conflict with the principle of the right to be forgotten in the face of human rights norms.In this regard, the authors of this article, through the analytical-descriptive method, achieved the important point that freedom of information is an absolute and unlimited right and should not be opposed to human rights norms like other human rights.
Jurisprudence and Law
Afshar Akbari; Wali Rostami; Faramarz Atrian
Abstract
Authorities and courts, dealing with complaints and disputes arising out of different disputes within a community, form a part of the legal system of that community. These authorities are usually created by legal mechanisms and are responsible for handling and adjudicating disputes and voting against ...
Read More
Authorities and courts, dealing with complaints and disputes arising out of different disputes within a community, form a part of the legal system of that community. These authorities are usually created by legal mechanisms and are responsible for handling and adjudicating disputes and voting against them. Some of these authorities have jurisdiction to handle specific disputes and disputes that are known as proprietary. It is important to take responsibility for the lawsuit against the government because of the high power and authority of the government over private individuals and how to prove it. Therefore, in this article, we review the legal system of the civil liability status of the government and the competent authorities dealing with its claims in Iranian law by comparing UK law. The government’s civil responsibility has made it a turning point in the Iranian legal system.
